sleep inducing for eeg recording in children: a comparison between oral midazolam and chloral hydrate

نویسندگان

mahmoud reza ashrafi professor of pediatric neurology, pediatrics centre of excellence, department of pediatric neurology, children’s medical centre, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran

reza azizi malamiri assistant professor of pediatric neurology, department of pediatric neurology, golestan medical, educational, and research centre, ahwaz jundishapur university of medical sciences, ahwaz, iran

gholam reza zamani associate professor of pediatric neurology, pediatrics centre of excellence, department of pediatric neurology, children’s medical centre, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran

mahmoud mohammadi professor of pediatric neurology, pediatrics centre of excellence, department of pediatric neurology, children’s medical centre, tehran university of medical sciences, tehran, iran

چکیده

how to cite this article: ashrafimr, azizi malamiri r, zamani gr, mohammadi m, hosseini f. sleep inducing for eeg recording in children: a comparison between oral midazolam and chloral hydrate. iran j child neurol. 2013 winter;7(1):15-19. objective electroencephalography (eeg) recording is a long duration procedure that needs patient’s cooperation for device setup and performing the procedure. many children lose their cooperation during this procedure. therefore, sedation and sleep are frequently induced using a few agents as pre procedure medication in children before eeg recording. we aimed to compare the sedative effects of oral midazolam versus chloral hydrate before the procedure along with their impacts on eeg recording in children. material s & methods a randomized trial was carried out to compare the sedative effects of oral midazolam versus chloral hydrate and their impacts on eeg recording in children. a total of 198 children (100 in the midazolam group and 98 in the chloral hydrate group) were enrolled in the study and randomly allocated to receive either oral moidazolam or chloral hydrate. results oral midazolam had superiority neither in sleep onset latency nor in sleep duration when compared to chloral hydrate. moreover, the yield of epileptiform discharges in the chloral hydrate group was more than the midazolam group. conclusion the results of this study showed that both chloral hydrate 5% (one ml/kg) and oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) could be administered as a pre medication agent for eeg recording in children. however, oral midazolam at this dose had no advantage compared with chloral hydrate. references ashrafi mr, mohammadi m, tafarroji j, shabanian r, salamati p, zamani gr. melatonin versus chloral hydrate for recording sleep eeg. eur j paediatr neurol 2010;14(3):235-8. slifer kj, avis kt, frutchey ra. behavioral intervention to increase compliance with electroencephalographic procedures in children with developmental disabilities. epilepsy behav 2008;13 (1):189-95. gauillard j, cheref s, vacherontrystram mn, martin jc. [chloral hydrate: a hypnotic best forgotten?]. encephale 2002;28(3 pt 1):200-4. cote cj, karl hw, notterman da, weinberg ja, mccloskey c. adverse sedation events in pediatrics: analysis of medications used for sedation. pediatrics 2000;106(4):633-44. greenblatt dj, ehrenberg bl, culm ke, scavone jm, corbett ke, friedman hl, et al. kinetics and eeg effects of midazolam during and after 1-minute, 1-hour, and 3-hour intravenous infusions. j clin pharmacol 2004;44(6):605-11. gurakan f, yuce a, ozen h, saltic in. midazolam and pethidine for the sedation of children undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. crit care med 2000;28(6):2176-7. karl hw, cote cj, mccubbin mm, kelley m, liebelt e, kaufman s, et al. intravenous midazolam for sedation of children undergoing procedures: an analysis of age- and procedure-related factors. pediatr emerg care 1999;15(3):167-72. lightdale jr, mitchell pd, fredette me, mahoney lb, zgleszewski se, scharff l, et al. a pilot study of ketamine versus midazolam/fentanyl sedation in children undergoing gi endoscopy. int j pediatr 2011; 2011:623710. massanari m, novitsky j, reinstein lj. paradoxical reactions in children associated with midazolam use during endoscopy. 1997;36(12):681-4. scott rc, besag fm, boyd sg, berry d, neville bg. buccal absorption of midazolam: pharmacokinetics and eeg pharmacodynamics. epilepsia 1998;39(3):290-4. loewy j, hallan c, friedman e, martinez c. sleep/sedation in children undergoing eeg testing: a comparison of chloral hydrate and music therapy. am j electroneurodiagnostic technol 2006;46(4):343-55. rodriguez e, jordan r. contemporary trends in pediatric sedation and analgesia. emerg med clin north am 2002;20(1):199-222. sisson df, siegel j. chloral hydrate anesthesia: eeg power spectrum analysis and effects on veps in the rat. neurotoxicol teratol 1989;11(1):51-6. thoresen m, henriksen o, wannag e, laegreid l. does a sedative dose of chloral hydrate modify the eeg of children with epilepsy? electroencephalogr clin neurophysiol 1997;102(2):152-7.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Sleep Inducing for EEG Recording in Children: A Comparison between Oral Midazolam and Chloral Hydrate

OBJECTIVE Electroencephalography (EEG) recording is a long duration procedure that needs patient's cooperation for device setup and performing the procedure. Many children lose their cooperation during this procedure. Therefore, sedation and sleep are frequently induced using a few agents as pre procedure medication in children before EEG recording. We aimed to compare the sedative effects of o...

متن کامل

Melatonin versus chloral hydrate for recording sleep EEG.

Although behavioral training could be successful in promoting electroencephalogram (EEG) compliance without restraint or sedation, sleep EEG may increase the yield of seizure activity. Furthermore uncooperative children not amenable to behavioral training require sedation for EEG recording. Our aim was to assess the impact of melatonin on the sleep EEG recording in comparison with chloral hydra...

متن کامل

Efficacy of Chloral Hydrate-Hydroxyzine and Chloral Hydrate-Midazolam in Pediatric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation

OBJECTIVE Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful diagnostic tool for the evaluation of congenital or acquired brain lesions. But, in all of less than 8-year-old children, pharmacological agents and procedural sedation should be used to induce motionless conditions for imaging studies. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of combination of chloral hydrate-hydrox...

متن کامل

Chloral and Chloral Hydrate

These substances were considered by a previous Working Group, in February 1995 (IARC, 1995). Since that time, new data have become available and these have been incorporated into the monograph and taken into consideration in the present evaluation.

متن کامل

Chloral hydrate versus midazolam as sedative agents for diagnostic procedures in children.

OBJECTIVE To compare sedation outcomes for chloral hydrate (CH) and midazolam (MD) as sedative agents for diagnostic procedures in children. METHODS A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study conducted between July 2005 and October 2006, at the Pediatric Day Care Unit (DCU), King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. After meeting the inclusion criteria and getting informed conse...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
iranian journal of child neurology

جلد ۷، شماره ۱، صفحات ۱۵-۱۹

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023